ML vs Human ModelA common area for learning analytics is to look for ways to support struggling students.  Largely, the focus has been on how to identify students of concern.  In a free and open report, a collaboration of researchers from major Universities have outlined exactly that: how to identify students who may not graduate high school.

Here are the amazing findings of a dataset of 11,000 students:

  • Machine Learning far outperformed the human method for identifying at risk students
  • The Predictive ML Model only got more precise as time when on (and more data collected) as opposed to the human method that became less precise.
  • The ML models aims to rank students by order of predicted need for intervention and to also determine when the intervention is needed
  • The ML model also aims to predict the likely success of a given intervention.

Powerful stuff!  It’s a quick and worthy read for any Education Data aficionado.

Find the entire report here


Disclaimer: The data and graphics used on this site are simulated re-creations intended to protect the privacy of the original data sources.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.